An educated demarchy, also known as a random democracy, is a form of government in which decision-making is carried out by randomly selected citizens who have received a high level of education. This system is designed to address the issues of corruption and inequality that can arise in other forms of democracy, such as when elected officials are influenced by special interest groups or when certain segments of the population are underrepresented.
But would an educated demarchy actually make for a better electoral system? To answer this question, it’s important to first understand how this system works and how it differs from other forms of democracy.
In an educated demarchy, eligible citizens are selected at random to serve on decision-making bodies, such as councils or juries. These citizens must have received a high level of education, such as a college degree, in order to be eligible. This ensures that the individuals making decisions are knowledgeable and capable of considering complex issues from multiple perspectives.
One of the key advantages of an educated demarchy is that it can help to prevent corruption and undue influence. In a traditional democracy, elected officials may be susceptible to bribery, lobbying, and other forms of corruption. This can lead to decisions that are not in the best interests of the general public, but rather serve the interests of wealthy or powerful individuals or groups. In contrast, an educated demarchy does not rely on elected officials. Instead, decisions are made by randomly selected individuals who are not subject to the same pressures and incentives as elected officials. This can help to ensure that decisions are made based on the merits of the issue at hand, rather than on the influence of special interest groups.
Another advantage of an educated demarchy is that it can help to promote greater representation and inclusion. In a traditional democracy, certain segments of the population may be underrepresented or marginalized, such as minority groups or low-income individuals. This can lead to policies and decisions that do not adequately address the needs and concerns of these groups. In an educated demarchy, however, the random selection process can help to ensure that a diverse range of voices and perspectives are included in decision-making bodies. This can help to ensure that the needs and concerns of all members of the community are considered and addressed, rather than just those of a select few.
Of course, there are also potential drawbacks to an educated demarchy. One concern is that the random selection process may not necessarily lead to the best possible decision-makers. Just because an individual has received a high level of education does not necessarily mean that they are well-suited to making complex decisions on behalf of the community. There is also the possibility that the selection process could be manipulated or biased in some way, which could undermine the fairness and integrity of the system.
Despite these potential drawbacks, an educated demarchy has a lot of potential as a more equitable and effective form of democracy. It offers a way to address some of the key challenges facing traditional democracies, such as corruption and unequal representation. While more research and experimentation are needed to fully understand the potential of this system, it is definitely worth considering as a potential alternative to our current electoral systems.
- “Ur Fascism” by Umberto Eco (https://www.amazon.com/Ur-Fascism-Umberto-Eco/dp/0156001544)
- “Random Selection in Politics” by Dana Richard Herberholz (https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/random-selection-in-politics/A8A70BD746AAB8699E7CAC1F8A9D0B1B)
- “The Case for Random Selection” by James Fishkin (https://www.jstor.org/stable/27648904)